Recycling Tax Money and Politicians

Bill 47 was passed unanimously by the City Council and signed into law by Mayor Carlisle. It removed a long-standing “subsidy” for island automobile recyclers. The big tipping fee discount for ASR, or automotive shredder residue dumped into the landfill, had netted Hawaii’s largest metal recycler, Schnitzer Steel, around $19 million since 1998. Schnitzer, pocketed $1.9 in taxpayer largesse last year alone. They don’t really need it as they are very profitable (netting about $1 a month in Hawaii). Perhaps they shouldn’t be dumping ASR at any price since the toxic content of their recyling waste, much of which originates on the Neighbor Islands is under fire by environmentalists. When asked to show any actual need for this subsidy, Schitzer curtly informed the City Council that they had no right to see their books. But, they still wanted the money back to pad their bottom line and, due to our malleable city council, might actually get it. After a monumental lobbying effort by Schnitzer, the Council is now trying its best to put this corporate welfare back.

The full Council passed their new Bill 36 (7 to 2), to reestablish the Schnitzer pay off, only three days after their Bill 47 (removing it) was signed into law. Only Tom Berg and Breene Harimoto were not “persauded” by Schnitzer’s back room shenanigans.

In his daily blog, Ian Lind listed a partial roster of Schnitzer’s army of lobbyists:

‘Then there’s Schnitzer Steel Hawaii with an unusual number of big guns, including “Red” Morris and John Radcliffe, PR exec Cindy McMillan, John Sabas (married to Jennifer Goto Sabas, Sen. Dan Inouye’s chief of staff), Travis Taylor (former communications advisor to Duke Aiona), and former city council member (remember her?) Rene Mansho.”

In fact, you won’t find anyone who testified on behalf of Schnitzer’s “entitlement” that was not on their payroll. Ex-City Council person, Rene Mansho has been employed by Schnitzer for years as their “community relations” specialist. Her job description also seems to involve lobbying her old colleagues. She often attends council hearings with a gaggle of blue-shirted Schnitzer employees in tow, Rene sings the praises of her employer while she lines up her conscripts for photo ops. The origin of the lucrative recycling “subsidy” that they all share dates back to Rene’s active city council days, and according to Schitzer insiders, her job depends on her holding it all together.

Mayor Carlisle will most likely veto this “unbudgeted” pay off to a profitable mainland corporation. It remains to be seen, however,  whether Schitzer’s investment in cultivating “loyalty” among their seven council members will hold together enough for an override. Judging by the growing voter backlash, controversial environmental liabilities and general stink of the political downside; it’s anybody’s call.

When asked over and over, why this was being done, and what possible benefit the taxpayer’s would get from this unjustifiable give-away of their money, the Schnitzer Seven have offered little convincing logic. Every taxpayer in Honolulu should press for the answer to that question before we let them pull this scam off.


3 responses

  1. There was a letter in yesterday’s paper saying how ending the subsidy would result in jots of junk cars left abandoned all over the island. This is exactly the kind of nonsense fear campaign that Schnitzer’s former manager warned of, when he testified before the city council. I’ll bet certain council members start reciting the same thing to try to justify this ridiculous giveaway that has nothing to do with removing junk cars or recycling.

  2. Schnitzer and their minions have rolled out one fake threat after another in their attempt to keep the taxpayer’s money. It’s all bogus.

    In addition, their paid goons have:

    1. Threatened the jobs of people who testified against them, by pressuring their employers to silence them.

    2. Intimidated media outlets into suppressing stories critical of Schnitzer.

    3. Lied about the future of the Aloha Aina program (it is not affected).

    4. Lied about SEC regulations that supposedly prohibited a financial disclosure of need (SEC has no such rules…Schnitzer has no real need of the subsidy.)

    Schnitzer just wants your dam money….and will do whatever it takes to get it. And, they currently have seven our nine City Councilman going along with it.

  3. Ah yes, more profiles in courage by our estimable and affordable Council.

    I just hope schnauzer,er, schnitzel, I mean Schnitzer doesn’t decide to be a rail supporter or there will be no stopping that monster!

    Let’s all go to the front of the class and sing the Schnitzer theme song:

    “That’s the way,uh huh,uh huh, I like it…..uh huh uh huh…”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s