Abercrombie Intended to Sink U.S. Taxpayers, Not Guam

Retired Congressman Abercrombie colleague, Hank Johnson, was afraid Guam would "tip over and capsize" as a result of massive military relocation. (way left: Rep Hank Johnson, right: the former island of Guam

Abercrombie’s pal and fellow member of the the U.S. Congress, House Armed Services Committee, Hank Johnson, took some pretty harsh flack for saying something really stupid.  Boneheaded pronouncements from this particular committtee are not infrequent  (See Neil’s gem about non-Kosher ammo or his botched reference to the Blue Brothers).

Anyway, according to the Huffington Post Johnson was fearful Guam would sink:

“The best part of hearing Johnson say, “My fear is that the whole island will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize,” is hearing the commander try to explain why it’s probably — no, definitely — not going to happen.”

We’ll chalk up Johnson’s boo boo to Washington “mis-speak,” but Abercrombie’s attempt, last year,  to add $10 billion in taxpayers dollars to the construction costs of the huge military relocation construction tab was a blatant attempt to garner labor votes for his upcoming gubernatorial race.

The Washington Post didn’t mince words:

“TUCKED AWAY in the 2010 Defense Authorization Bill just passed by the House is a provision that should give senators — and taxpayers — pause…inserted by Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii) c… It has more than doubled the cost of the relocation by requiring that at least 70 percent of the construction force be U.S. citizens and that construction workers be paid at the Hawaiian prevailing wage rate, which is double to triple Guam’s…the change would drive construction worker compensation costs to more than $10 billion.”

It’s not surprising that one of Abercrombie’s final acts as a U.S. Congressman was one last grab at the taxpayer’s money.

More fun reading:

Hawaii Congressman Under Fire

Follow the money: $10B Guam pork project benefits Abercrombie contributor

Washington Post editorial criticizes Abercrombie defense bill provision


Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s